Many of my clients start our conversation with a request for a "super slick" presentation. I think "slick" is not the most important requirement of a business presentation. I usually go for a restrained, professional look. Here is why too much slickness might backfire:

  • Nobody trusts a smooth talking politician or car salesman. Super slick graphics might just give the impression that there is something to hide.
  • Spectacular moving visual effects might just make the audience giggle, because it sort seems out of place for the setting of a small conference room presentation
  • Complex graphics create technical and practical problems. They take a lot of space making it harder to share documents, videos often go wrong in live presentations, breaking the flow/momentum of a pitch, custom-made graphics are hard to edit and change (presentations are living creations that change all the time), fonts always create problems when they are not installed properly
  • "The cliff": often I see incredibly sophisticated presentation starts (slide, 1, 2, 3), but pages 4 to 50 look incredibly boring with standard bullet point slides.
  • Often the key to a pitch is not a dramatic trend, but a small, clever innovation that makes you stand out. Investing a lot of time (and money) in visualising a mega trend that is already pretty obvious to everyone ("facebook is big" for example) is a waste of effort and takes the attention away from the really important point in your presentation

"Slick" does not always help to make your message clear.

Image taken from WikiPedia

If you liked this post, why not subscribe to daily updates about presentation design via email? Just blog posts, no spam, or you can follow Jan on Twitter to never miss a thing.